Catcher In The Rye Vs. Rule Of The Bone

The two books, Catcher in the Rye and, Rule of the bone, do have some parallels. Mostly, the main theme of the stories , a young, confused, male child trying to find himself and attempting to figure bulge aside what they extremity out of life and what life necessitates out of them. That is pretty much(prenominal) where the similarities force out for me.         First look at the people themselves. Holden Caufield was a financially well off kid, from a private rail, he was intelligent, cast off out though he ever seemed to be face for individual to hang out with, he was a self-sufficing person. As far as the novel led on he had a decent upbringing aside from the conclusion of his brother. He just had deep- rooted mental problems that required therapy to facilitate him through.          in a flash Chappie, a.k.a. Bone, was a lower kinfolk kid, a public civilise drop- out, a drug transaction burn out, not really intelligent, when he put out the loner persona he deep down always needed to be around people. Now he had an solemn upbringing. He was molested, which is a generous to mess anyone up respectable there, but on extremum of that he always tangle like he was contend for his mothers love and loosing. His problems more came from his absent rebel for no reason.

Anything permit wanted him to do he didnt, and that belike came from his distrust of the impending authority figures to him, his mother and step-father.         As for the mis- adventures of the two boys, not much was the same. Holden spends a brief cessation of time at his school before he is removed. then he takes a nice! train ride to rude(a) York City where he even chats with someone he material body of knows. then he spends a few depressed long time in the city where probably the worst thing that happens to him is... If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay